Enactment of military agreement, unconstitutional argument itself

Raw Food Diet: กินดิบให้สุขภาพดี ทั้งโปรตีนจากพืชและสัตว์

Talk About Women

Enactment of military agreement, unconstitutional argument itself
The presidential office of Cheong Wa Dae said on Tuesday that it is an unconstitutional idea to call the bill unconstitutional. Such an argument is "original legal misunderstanding." Cheong Wa Dae spokesman Kim Eui-gyeom said during a regular briefing at the Chunchoo. Moon Jae-in, the president (23) was 'Pyongyang, 19 September Joint Declaration' by the Cabinet and military reviews and decides the ratification agreement and ash.<a href="https://www.betsarang.com">토토사이트</a> "Article 60, which is based on a constitutional argument, talks about the requirements of a treaty requiring parliamentary approval," Kim said. But North Korea is not a nation in the Constitution and our legal system. Therefore, Kim said that the agreement and promise made with North Korea are not treaties, and that the word "constitutional" cannot be applied. "Then, when we ask what North Korea is," Kim added, "The Act on the Development of Inter-Korean Relations in 2005, says that it is a special relationship that is tentatively formed in the process of seeking unification, not between nations." Kim explained, "The South-North Relations Development Act stipulates the basis for the inter-Korean agreement, and if the National Assembly needs approval, it requires a heavy financial burden and legislation." He also added that the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court judged that the agreement was not subject to the Constitution. Both the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court are not applying the provisions of the treaty to the Constitution, considering that the agreement is between authorities based on special relations within the Korean community, Kim said. He also said, "If we claim that ratification of the inter-Korean agreement is unconstitutional based on Article 60 of the Constitution, we recognize the nation as a stern state." "If we claim unconstitutional on the basis of Article 60 of the Constitution, it would violate Article 3 of the Korean Constitution and its annexation of the Korean Peninsula," Kim said. Asked how he sees the "big financial burden" stipulated by the inter-Korean relations development law, Kim explained that the government made the decision on the heavy financial burden first. Regarding President Moon Jung-in's remarks on unification, foreign affairs and national security, Kim said, "We can't rule out the possibility of the end of the year." It seems inappropriate for the government to comment on the ongoing discussion. When asked whether North Korean leader Kim Jong Un's return to Seoul is aimed at denuclearizing the Korean Peninsula or regularizing inter-Korean summit meetings, Kim's answer is to end the 70-year-old relationship between the two countries. "We will ask the opposition party for cooperation and convey our intention to sign the ratification bill to various degrees," he said. 24 Oct 2018 \| Post by : dearrrrmor15

The presidential office of Cheong Wa Dae said on Tuesday that it is an unconstitutional idea to call the bill unconstitutional. Such an argument is "original legal misunderstanding."

Cheong Wa Dae spokesman Kim Eui-gyeom said during a regular briefing at the Chunchoo. Moon Jae-in, the president (23) was 'Pyongyang, 19 September Joint Declaration' by the Cabinet and military reviews and decides the ratification agreement and ash.<a href="https://www.betsarang.com">토토사이트</a>

"Article 60, which is based on a constitutional argument, talks about the requirements of a treaty requiring parliamentary approval," Kim said. But North Korea is not a nation in the Constitution and our legal system.

Therefore, Kim said that the agreement and promise made with North Korea are not treaties, and that the word "constitutional" cannot be applied.

"Then, when we ask what North Korea is," Kim added, "The Act on the Development of Inter-Korean Relations in 2005, says that it is a special relationship that is tentatively formed in the process of seeking unification, not between nations."

Kim explained, "The South-North Relations Development Act stipulates the basis for the inter-Korean agreement, and if the National Assembly needs approval, it requires a heavy financial burden and legislation."

He also added that the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court judged that the agreement was not subject to the Constitution. Both the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court are not applying the provisions of the treaty to the Constitution, considering that the agreement is between authorities based on special relations within the Korean community, Kim said.

He also said, "If we claim that ratification of the inter-Korean agreement is unconstitutional based on Article 60 of the Constitution, we recognize the nation as a stern state." "If we claim unconstitutional on the basis of Article 60 of the Constitution, it would violate Article 3 of the Korean Constitution and its annexation of the Korean Peninsula," Kim said.

Asked how he sees the "big financial burden" stipulated by the inter-Korean relations development law, Kim explained that the government made the decision on the heavy financial burden first.

Regarding President Moon Jung-in's remarks on unification, foreign affairs and national security, Kim said, "We can't rule out the possibility of the end of the year." It seems inappropriate for the government to comment on the ongoing discussion.

When asked whether North Korean leader Kim Jong Un's return to Seoul is aimed at denuclearizing the Korean Peninsula or regularizing inter-Korean summit meetings, Kim's answer is to end the 70-year-old relationship between the two countries.

"We will ask the opposition party for cooperation and convey our intention to sign the ratification bill to various degrees," he said.

24 Oct 2018 | Post by : dearrrrmor15

Comment

Recommended Clinic

Beauty Clinic

Webboard
มีเรื่องสมมติมาถามคะ 1 Jan 1970 โพสต์โดย: atlove 10
ยาแต้มสิว smooth E กี่วันยุบ 1 Jan 1970 โพสต์โดย: pmeepooh 3
เทียบชัดๆ...มอยส์เจอไรเซอร์กระปุกไหนเริ่ดสุด 1 Jan 1970 โพสต์โดย: hhiippoo 2
อยากรู้ไหมทำไมผู้หญิงถึงโดนผู้ชาย==ทิ้ง== 24 Dec 9666 โพสต์โดย: ชายอยากบอก 26
แจกแพท รองเท้าคู่แรกของลูกคะ มาถักให้ลูกกันนะคะ 1 Jan 1970 โพสต์โดย: toom_ipunn 8
จะไปเที่ยวทะเล ใครมีเครื่องสำอางกันน้ำเริ่ดๆ มาแนะนำกันหน่อยค่ะ 1 Jan 1970 โพสต์โดย: bymemake 4
เป็นตกขาวบวกกินไม่พึงประสงค์แก้กันยังไงบ้างคะ 1 Jan 1970 โพสต์โดย: p_pitcha 5
AHA จากผลไม้ ที่ผสมในสกินแคร์ ช่วยอะไรกับผิว 1 Jan 1970 โพสต์โดย: NongLukBua 0